Remaking Our World One Gene at a Time
"The future is not what it used to be, and the greatest revolution since the Industrial Age is quietly unfolding in laboratory petri dishes."
In 1998, social thinker Jeremy Rifkin presented a provocative vision in The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World. He argued that while most public attention was focused on the computer revolution, a far more profound transformation was building—one that would fundamentally alter our relationship with nature itself. After running on parallel tracks for forty years, information technology and life sciences were fusing into a single powerful force, laying the foundation for what Rifkin termed the "Biotech Century" 1 2 .
Ability to identify, isolate, and recombine DNA as raw material
Managing vast genetic databases with sophisticated computer systems
Profound implications for society, environment, and human identity
We are in the throes of one of the great transformations in world history. The industrial era, "propelled by cheap and abundant extractive energy" and characterized by "brawn and speed," is giving way to a new economic paradigm 2 . Rifkin notes that our way of life "is likely to be more fundamentally transformed in the next several decades than in the previous one thousand years" 2 .
At the epicenter of this change is our newly acquired ability to "reorganize life at the genetic level" 2 . For the first time, scientists can identify, isolate, and recombine DNA, treating it as a raw material to engineer entirely new life forms—from mustard plants that grow chains of polymers to microorganisms that clean up waste through "bioremediation" 3 .
Ability to manipulate DNA as a resource to engineer new life forms
Current implementation: HighThe race to claim ownership of genetic resources through patents
Current implementation: HighReleasing genetically engineered organisms into ecosystems
Current implementation: MediumThe potential to alter human fetuses to correct diseases and enhance traits
Current implementation: EmergingThe Biotech Century would not be possible without its predecessor—the Information Age. Rifkin explains that "when fully complete, the basic human genome database will equal a telephone book that contains three billion entries" 3 . When genetic variations are factored in, this database becomes "ten thousand times the size of the original database" 3 .
This staggering amount of biological information requires sophisticated computer systems to manage and analyze, leading to the emergence of "bioinformatics" as a crucial field 2 . The marriage of computers and genes extends beyond data management—researchers are exploring DNA itself as a replacement for silicon in microchips. DNA computers offer extraordinary speed advantages because they "naturally handles data in a parallel manner" 3 . The first DNA computer solved a simple math problem in 1994, heralding a potential new era of biological computing 3 .
Rifkin presents one of his most concerning visions: This represents an unprecedented concentration of power over the very building blocks of life.
Hold patents on disease-related genes for drug development
Focus on specific gene therapies and diagnostic tools
Patent genetically modified crops and livestock
Universities and government labs holding foundational patents
The patenting of genes and organisms has created what Rifkin calls "a new colonial frontier" 3 . Developing nations in the southern hemisphere, rich in biological diversity, often see their genetic resources extracted and patented by corporations with little return to the countries of origin. This has sparked heated debates in international courtrooms and the United Nations 3 .
The implications extend beyond international equity. Rifkin warns that reducing the world's gene pool to patented intellectual property controlled by a few life-science corporations could fundamentally alter global economy and society 1 .
Global agriculture may be entering its greatest transition since the Neolithic revolution. Rifkin envisions "an increasing volume of food and fiber being grown indoors in tissue culture in giant bacteria baths" at a fraction of the cost of traditional farming 2 .
While this could mean cheaper prices and more abundant food, it also threatens to uproot millions of farmers worldwide, potentially creating "one of the great social upheavals in world history" 2 . The environmental implications are equally profound—what Rifkin terms "genetic pollution" from released genetically modified organisms could wreak havoc on Earth's ecosystems 2 .
Perhaps the most profound changes Rifkin anticipates involve the engineering of human life itself. He suggests that within several decades:
Could become commonplace, with "replication" partially replacing "reproduction" 2
Parents may choose to have children gestated outside the human body 1
Changes could be made in human fetuses to correct diseases and enhance traits 1
The social implications extend to what Rifkin terms "genetocracy"—a society where individuals are "increasingly categorized and stereotyped by genotype," potentially leading to "an informal biological caste system" 2 . Genetic information could be used by "schools, employers, insurance companies, and governments to determine educational tracks, employment prospects, insurance premiums, and security clearances" 2 .
In 1994, a groundbreaking experiment demonstrated that DNA could be used to solve computational problems, marking the birth of DNA computing 3 . This experiment perfectly illustrates Rifkin's thesis about the convergence of biological and information sciences.
The researchers exploited DNA's natural ability to process information in parallel. They:
Into DNA sequences, using the four nucleic acids (A, T, C, G) as biological representations of binary code
Representing all possible solutions to the mathematical problem
To let the DNA molecules combine and search for valid solutions through molecular bonding
The correct solutions using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques
Through DNA sequencing technologies
The DNA computer successfully solved a simple math problem, demonstrating that biological molecules could function as computational devices 3 . While elementary compared to silicon computers, this experiment revealed two revolutionary advantages:
| Characteristic | Silicon Computing | DNA Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Processing Type | Sequential and limited parallel | Massively parallel |
| Speed | Fast clock cycles | Simultaneous operations |
| Energy Consumption | Relatively high | Minimal |
| Data Density | Limited by transistor size | Extremely high (molecular scale) |
| Current Stage | Mature technology | Experimental phase |
The scientific importance lies in potentially overcoming the physical limitations of silicon-based computing. As Rifkin notes, "DNA chips are created through photolithography just like silicon chips" but with the advantage that DNA "naturally handles data in a parallel manner and therefore is immensely faster than silicon" 3 .
Rifkin's work ultimately serves as both prediction and warning. He raises "more troubling questions than any other economic revolution in history" 1 :
Rifkin leaves readers with two divergent paths forward 3 . One leads toward large-scale genetic engineering of the natural world and human species; the other toward more conservative ecological and preventative health practices. Rifkin himself favors the second path, suggesting that while biotechnology will develop swiftly, "its implementation will be closely monitored" 3 .
Twenty-seven years after its publication, The Biotech Century remains remarkably prescient. The genetic revolution it anticipated is now fully underway, making its questions more urgent than ever. As Rifkin suggests, the biotech revolution may ultimately force us "to put a mirror to our most deeply held values, making us ponder the ultimate question of the purpose and meaning of existence" 1 .
The Biotech Century challenges us to ensure that our technological capabilities are guided by ethical wisdom—reminding us that progress should be measured not just by what we create, but by what we preserve.