Bridging neuroscience, linguistics, and animal behavior to unlock the secrets of communication
What can a parrot possibly tell us about human language? For Dianne K. Patterson, Ph.D., a research scientist at the University of Arizona, the answer is: more than you might imagine. With a unique background spanning psychology, linguistics, and neuroimaging, Patterson has spent her career unraveling the mysteries of how communication systems are learned and processed—whether in the human brain or in the vocal tract of an African Grey parrot.
Advanced brain scanning to understand language processing
Analyzing vocal learning across species
Understanding the structure of communication
Her unconventional approach to studying language has led to surprising discoveries about what parrots can teach us about human speech and how our own brains adapt when learning new languages. By bridging seemingly disconnected fields, Patterson offers rare insights into one of humanity's most defining characteristics: our capacity for language.
Dianne Patterson's research career spans two seemingly distinct yet fundamentally connected domains: the mechanics of vocal production in parrots and the neural basis of language learning in humans. This unusual combination allows her to approach language from multiple angles, asking questions that researchers trained in a single discipline might overlook.
How do parrots produce human speech sounds? What articulatory similarities exist across species?
How does the brain change when learning a new language? What neural networks support statistical learning?
In her human language research, Patterson has helped reveal how flexible and dynamic our brains remain when it comes to language learning. In a 2015 study, she and her colleagues demonstrated that even adult brains can show shifts in lateralization when exposed to unfamiliar languages 1 6 .
Using fMRI, they found that as participants learned to identify words in Norwegian, their brain activation became increasingly left-lateralized—the pattern typically associated with native language processing 6 . This challenged the notion that language lateralization is fixed in adulthood, suggesting instead that it adapts based on learning and experience.
Her work on statistical learning—how humans unconsciously extract patterns from language input—has identified key brain networks involved in this process 4 . Unlike artificial language learning studies, Patterson used stimuli drawn from natural languages (Russian), revealing that the inferior frontal gyrus acts as a crucial hub for morphological learning 4 6 .
Language processing shifts in the brain during learning
Patterson has consistently developed and advocated for advanced methodological approaches in neuroimaging research. She recognized early that as brain imaging datasets grew more complex, researchers needed better tools to visualize and understand their data.
One of her significant contributions is the development of dynamic data visualization tools that allow researchers to explore brain imaging data in more interactive ways 4 .
She introduced the neuroimaging community to Weave—a visualization workbench originally designed for geographic data—and enhanced it with brain choropleths (region-based brain maps) 4 . This innovation allows researchers to create interactive visualizations where brain maps are dynamically linked to behavioral, genetic, and medical data, enabling deeper exploration of complex relationships in neuroimaging datasets 4 .
Interactive visualization of brain imaging data
Her work on BIDS (Brain Imaging Data Structure) further demonstrates her commitment to improving neuroimaging methodology 4 . BIDS provides a standardized format for organizing and describing neuroimaging datasets, making research more reproducible and collaborative across laboratories worldwide.
Patterson's doctoral research on psittacine speech production culminated in a series of elegant experiments that revealed precisely how a Grey parrot named Alex could produce human-like vowels. Published in 1994 and 1996, these studies used multiple imaging techniques to correlate the parrot's vocal tract configuration with the acoustic properties of the sounds produced 6 .
The research team employed three complementary methods:
African Grey parrots like Alex have remarkable vocal learning abilities.
Alex, the African Grey parrot, was prompted to produce target vowels multiple times to ensure consistent measurements.
For each production, the team collected synchronized audio and visual data using their multi-method imaging approach.
The research team measured formant frequencies—the acoustic resonances that determine vowel quality—from the recorded speech samples.
Patterson and her colleagues identified key articulatory correlates from the imaging data, including beak opening, tongue position, and laryngeal placement.
The team compared both acoustic and articulatory data between the parrot and human speech, identifying both parallels and differences in their production mechanisms.
The findings revealed a fascinating mix of similarities and differences between human and parrot speech production. The parrot's /i/ and /a/ vowels showed formant patterns that were recognizably similar to human productions, explaining why human listeners could readily identify these vowels 6 .
| Vowel Sound | Human Recognizability |
|---|---|
| /i/ ("eat") | High (easily identified by human listeners) |
| /a/ ("rock") | High (easily identified by human listeners) |
| Articulatory Feature | Human vs. Parrot |
|---|---|
| Tongue Role | Primary articulator vs. Modified vocal tract shape |
| Beak/Oral Opening | Minor spectral influence vs. Major resonance modifier |
| Laryngeal Placement | Relatively stable vs. Strategically positioned |
Perhaps most remarkably, the research demonstrated that parrots use their vocal tracts in some, but not all, of the ways humans do to produce speech sounds 6 . This suggested that different species might arrive at similar acoustic outcomes through different articulatory means—a concept that challenges simplistic comparisons across species.
Modern neuroimaging research relies on specialized tools and resources that enable precise data collection and analysis. While Patterson's work doesn't use chemical reagents in the traditional sense, her research employs crucial methodological "reagents"—standardized tools and approaches that ensure reproducible, reliable science.
Checks neuroimaging datasets for format compliance
Application: Ensuring data standardization and reproducibility 4
Dynamic data visualization workbench
Application: Exploring brain imaging data with linked representations 4
Computational processing and analysis
Application: Handling neuroimaging data pipelines 1
Software environment standardization
Application: Reproducible computational environments 1
These methodological "reagents" play a role analogous to chemical reagents in wet-lab sciences: they enable standardized, replicable procedures that yield reliable results. Patterson has specifically taught courses on these computational tools, recognizing their importance in modern neuroimaging research 1 .
Her commitment to open science and standardized methods extends to her work on BIDS (Brain Imaging Data Structure), which functions as a kind of "protocol reagent" for the entire neuroimaging community 4 . Just as standardized solutions enable consistent experiments across chemistry labs, BIDS enables consistent data organization across neuroimaging labs.
Dianne Patterson's career exemplifies the power of crossing disciplinary boundaries to ask questions that more specialized researchers might miss. Her work reveals that the capacity for complex vocal learning—once thought uniquely human—exists in other species, and that our own brains maintain a remarkable flexibility for language learning throughout life.
From detailing the precise articulatory maneuvers of a parrot's vocal tract to mapping the dynamic neural networks of humans learning new languages, Patterson's research continues to illuminate the multiple facets of vocal communication. Her work reminds us that some of science's most fascinating discoveries await at the intersection of seemingly unrelated fields—and that sometimes, to understand what makes human language special, we need to listen carefully to what other species have to say.
"Her unique perspective continues to offer valuable insights into that most human of questions: how we learn, produce, and comprehend the sounds that connect us to one another."
As her current research continues to explore language processing in both healthy and clinical populations—including recent work on primary progressive aphasia and stroke recovery 6 —Patterson maintains the same spirit of interdisciplinary inquiry that has characterized her career from the beginning.